LMCC QUICK REFERENCE GUIDE

 

This document last updated on May 18, 2000

USE YOUR BROWSER "BACK" BUTTON

TO RETURN TO PREVIOUS PAGE.

DEFINITIONS

 

ACTUAL SERVICE AREA

§90.187 states fixed distances and values for the contours which determine when consent must be required. LMCC recommends the area in which consent is required be keyed to the actual service area of the proposed base station, based on power, antenna height and terrain using contour analysis rather than fixed figures. LMCC Comments to 2nd Report & Order, July, 1988, Para 12

The LMCC feels the current standard, requiring consent from all stations with service areas ". . . that overlap a circle with radius 113 km (70 mi.) from the proposed base station.", is excessive. With a normal service area extending approximately 30-35 miles from the base station coordinates, the geography in which consents currently must be obtained is far larger than the area in which interference could possibly occur. With the addition of stations whose signals may intersect the 70-mile circle, the full area of consent potentially extends 100 miles or more in any direction. The net effect of the current requirement is to make the trunked station simply impossible to attain, especially in urban areas. LMCC Comments to 2nd Report & Order, July, 1988, Para 13


CENTRALIZED TRUNKING

The 2nd R&O introduces centralized trunking which essentially requires exclusive channel assignment because monitoring of another licensee's frequencies is not required. See also "Trunking, Centralized"


CHANNELIZATION

Refarming seeks to optimize frequency use in the 150 to 512 MHZ bands through a new channelization scheme. LMCC Comments to 2nd Report & Order, July, 1988, Details @ Para 5 &6


CONSENSUS

§90.187(b)(2) stipulates that consent must be obtained from all licensees of specific frequencies in a service area before a trunking system will be licensed. LMCC feels the rules relating to the 450-512 MHZ band need to be changed to allow more realistic application of this consent requirement. See "Actual Service Area" in PROPOSALS section..

CONSOLIDATION

The "Refarming", or consolidation, of 20 private radio services is an attempt to increase spectrum efficiency. The 2nd Report and Order also set out rules for centralized trunking systems. . LMCC Comments to 2nd Report & Order, July, 1988, Details @ Para 7


DECENTRALIZED TRUNKING

Decentralized trunking allows sharing of frequencies in an area with other licensees because of the monitoring feature required in a decentralized trunking systems. See also "Trunking, Decentralized".

GREENMAIL

If it's not possible to clear a channel using the interference contour method and a letter of consent is required, LMCC is concerned that other potential applicants or licensees could crossfile on the frequencies of interest in order to prevent them from being otherwise assigned, leading to what's termed "greenmail". LMCC Comments to 2nd Report & Order, July, 1988, Details @ Para 19

Please see the section under proposals (PROTECTED TIME) where this is discussed in greater depth.


LEVEL 1 MONITORING

Uses the repeater's receiver to monitor for transmit signals from co-channel licensee mobile and portable units and would serve to disable the repeater transmitter during the co-channel unit's transmission. LMCC letter to Dan Phythyon, Esq, dated October 16, 1998.

LEVEL 2 MONITORING

In certain geographical or RF propagation situations where a repeater receiver may not hear co-channel mobile or portable units, it may be necessary to install a dedicated monitor receiver for each co-channel IG channel and a separate receive antenna.. LMCC letter to Dan Phythyon, Esq, dated October 16, 1998.

LMCC

The LMCC is a non-profit association of organizations representing virtually all users of land mobile radio systems, providers of land mobile services, and manufacturers of land mobile radio equipment. The LMCC acts with the consensus, and on behalf, of the vast majority of public safety, business, industrial, private, commercial and land transportation radio users on several frequency bands regulated by the FCC. LMCC Comments to 2nd Report & Order, July, 1988, Details @ Para 3

MEMBERSHIP, LMCC

LMCC membership consists of 21 members. LMCC Comments to 2nd Report & Order, July, 1988, Details @ Para 4

MONITORING LEVELS . LMCC letter to Dan Phythyon, Esq, dated October 16, 1998.

LEVEL 1 MONITORING

Uses the repeater's receiver to monitor for transmit signals from co-channel licensee mobile and portable units and would serve to disable the repeater transmitter during the co-channel unit's transmission.

LEVEL 2 MONITORING

In certain geographical or RF propagation situations where a repeater receiver may not hear co-channel mobile or portable units, it may be necessary to install a dedicated monitor receiver for each co-channel IG channel and a separate receive antenna.

NARROWBAND PROTECTION

As the 450-470 MHZ band moves toward narrowband operation and the greater efficiencies of centralized trunked systems, the LMCC is vitally interested in ensuring that it remain available to a wide variety of applicants. Trunking opportunities for NARROWBAND systems must not be eliminated due to the rapid deployment of trunked systems on 25 kHz primary channels. LMCC Comments to 2nd Report & Order, July, 1988, Details @ Para 18


OPTIMIZE FREQUENCY USE

Refarming seeks to optimize frequency use in the 150 to 512 bands through a new channelization scheme. LMCC Comments to 2nd Report & Order, July, 1988, Details @ Para 5 &6

RULES (§90.187, TRUNKING) REVISION NEEDED

In order to accomplish the Commission's goals of encouraging trunked radio systems in the 450-512 MHZ band, the need exists to change the provisions of this part to reflect field conditions. LMCC Comments to 2nd Report & Order, July, 1988, Details @ Para 2

TRUNKING


CENTRALIZED

The 2nd R&O sought to introduce centralized trunking, in which no monitoring is required prior to transmission. To protect the viability of the trunked system, the FCC provided that subsequent applicants for channels included in a trunked system within the system's service area must reach a mutual agreement with the trunked operator. However, to obtain a license for a centralized trunked system, the Commission imposed extensive requirements upon applicants to obtain consent to the proposed system from co-channel and adjacent channel licensees. LMCC Comments to 2nd Report & Order, July, 1988, Para 9


DECENTRALIZED

It has long been the policy of the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, and formerly the Private Radio Bureau, to permit "decentralized" trunking on private land mobile bands. In such systems, channels are combined into more efficient, trunked systems in which equipment seeks the next available channel to complete a transmission; however, the equipment monitors channels prior to initiating transmissions to avoid co-channel interference. Moreover, frequencies continue to be shared: the presence of a decentralized trunked system does not preclude additional licensing of the channels involved to other licensees within the system's licensed coverage area. LMCC Comments to 2nd Report & Order, July, 1988, Para 8

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><

LMCC "YG" TRUNKING SYSTEM PROPOSALS(1)

 

LIMITATIONS ON NUMBER OF CHANNELS IN APPLICATION

LMCC recommends allowing a maximum of ten channels in a single YG application.

However, a restriction on the number of channels in an application is meaningless without some requirement of action by the licensee prior to returning to the Commission for more channels.

The LMCC therefore recommends that a licensee certify completion of construction and commencement of operation be provided prior to the processing of an application for additional centralized or decentralized trunked channels by the same party in interest. As a vehicle familiar to most licensees and minimally burdensome to the Commission, the LMCC recommends the filing of Form 800 letters for this purpose. LMCC Supplemental Comments to 2nd Report & Order, July, 1988, Para 17, 23 & 24

Notwithstanding the above, the LMCC proposal is not meant to include the Public Safety Pool. LMCC Comments in the matter of 1998 Biennial Regulatory Review, WT Docket No. 98-182, Para IIE

PROTECTED TIME

LMCC is proposing a "protected" period of time to obtain required consents by electronically flagging, in the applicable databases, those frequencies which might be subject to "greenmail", in essence preserving the original applicant's interests in those frequencies. During this period of time, however, even though the first applicant is successful in gaining the necessary consents, subsequent application(s) for the target channels could be processed and filed with the Commission conditioned upon the subsequent applicant gaining the required consents to the proposed trunked system including those of the 1st applicant.

At the end of the period, only those frequencies for which the trunked station applicant had obtained the requisite consents would be included in the application forwarded to the Commission, with consent forms attached as specified in the current rules. Software flags would be removed from remaining channels, which would then become available to other applicants. LMCC Supplemental Comments to 2nd Report & Order, July, 1988, Details @ Para 20, 21 & 22

SERVICE AREA

The recognized service area for a station in the 450-470 MHZ band is considered to be its 39 dBu contour. Therefore, to adequately protect existing stations, the LMCC recommends that applicants proposing centralized trunked systems be required to obtain consent from existing co-channel and adjacent channel stations whose 39 dBu service contour intersects the proposed station's 21 dBu interference contour. As an outside limit, no base stations located more than 150 km (94 miles) from the proposed trunked station need be considered for the consent process. LMCC Supplemental Comments to 2nd Report & Order, July, 1988, Para 14

TRUNKING

Licensees have begun to employ trunking systems where the monitoring for co-channel emissions is not performed by the mobile unit, but rather by a monitor employed at the repeater transmitter. LMCC believes that such systems should be licensed with an "IG" service code, and should not require co-channel consent.

It is important that frequency coordinators and others be able to determine the operational mode of the system. Therefore, LMCC suggests that the Commission utilize a station class code addition in order to be able to designate on a single license those frequencies that are monitored and those that are not monitored.

LMCC proposes that any license which includes at least one non-monitored/centralized trunk channel should carry the "YB" radio service code and urges the Commission to adapt station class codes such as "FB2M"(2) ("M" for repeater- monitored). For example, an applicant seeking a five channel license would be issued a five channel "YG" license, designating four of the channels with an FB2M code and one channel with an FB2P (protected, non-monitored) code.

In sum, LMCC is seeking to identify on a license three different frequency usage situations which would also be readily apparent in a frequency specific database search: (1) a frequency where the licensee employs a manual means of monitoring the channel prior to transmission or the mobile radio itself performs the channel selection (FB2), (2) a frequency where the licensee employs a monitor at the transmitter repeater which automatically locks out a channel when there is co-channel emissions (FB2M), and (3) a frequency where the licensee does not employ any form of monitoring because of prior co-channel consent or sufficient contour clearance. LMCC Comments in the matter of 1998 Biennial Regulatory Review, WT Docket No. 98-182, Para IIC

2. The station example being utilized here assumes a private, internal use system. If the station is a community repeater, the station class would be FB4M or FB4P, as the case may be. A private carrier would be FB6M or FB6P and a non-profit cooperative would be FB7M or FB7P.

YG APPLICATIONS

LMCC proposes that all "YG" applications include either

1. an analysis showing that the interference contour (21 dBu) of the proposed station does not overlap the service contour (39 dBu) of any existing co-channel or adjacent channel station, or

2. letters of consent from all such overlapping station licensees.

The LMCC does not recommend a change in the degree of adjacency in which consent is required, based on the bandwidth of the proposed trunked system. LMCC Supplemental Comments to 2nd Report & Order, July, 1988, Details @ Para 15 &16

1. The sources of these proposals are listed in an appendix below.

************************************************************************************

SOURCE APPENDIX

The proposals contained in this compilation are from the following sources:

1.) LMCC COMMENTS IN THE MATTER OF 1998 BIENNIAL REGULATORY REVIEW - C.F.R. PART 90-PRIVATE LAND MOBILE RADIO SERVICES, et al.

WT DOCKET NO. 98-182

2.) LMCC SUPPLEMENTAL COMMENTS TO 2ND REPORT & ORDER, JULY, 1988

><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

LMCC LOW POWER/HIGH POWER PROPOSALS(3)
**Please note that the FCC has adopted an amended version of this porposal see the FCC Public Notice released June 29, 2000**

6.25 kHz OFFSET UHF CHANNELS

LMCC recommends that the 6.25 kHz channels immediately above and below those 12.5 kHz channels listed in Appendices A, B, C, and D receive the same low power designations as the associated 12.5 kHz channels. LMCC Plan, 6/4/97, Details @ 5

ALARM CHANNEL POWER LIMITS (CENTRAL STATION)

LMCC recommends maintaining the 2 watt power limit on the five channel pairs (Appendix C) designated for central station alarm use. LMCC Plan, 6/4/97, Detail @ 3

CERTIFICATION/ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

It is recommended that all frequency advisory committees require that high-power offset applicants sign a statement declaring that they acknowledge that their operations are secondary to incumbent low-power offset licensees, including medical telemetry users, until the Commission closes the seven-month transition window. The statement should also make it clear that the applicant will be operating the system on a non-interference basis and that if the system causes interference to incumbent low-power systems, the applicant is required to take what ever steps necessary to remedy the interference including the cessation of operations. High-power applicants should also be notified that they may receive interference from unlicensed operation for which their frequency coordinating committee is not responsible, other than to potentially assist in the resolution of the interference matter. This executed statement should be submitted to the Commission as part of the application package so that it becomes a part of the permanent licensing record.

The FCC's Licensing Division in Gettysburg has informed the LMCC that all applications for high-power use on offset channels must be accompanied by a statement from frequency advisory committees specifically certifying that the committee has made the appropriate determination that the proposed operation will not cause interference to incumbent operations. The routine committee certification stamp is NOT sufficient for this purpose. LMCC Guidelines for the Frequency Coordination and Certification of High Power Systems on UHF Offset Channels within the Industrial/Business Pool

CONSTRUCTION DEADLINES

LMCC supports the Commission's proposal to standardize the construction period of Part 90 licensees at one (1) year. LMCC Comments in the matter of 1998 Biennial Regulatory Review, WT Docket No. 98-182, Para IIB

CONTOUR PREDICTION MODELS

At a minimum, R-6602 contour studies are to be employed to determine potential interference levels. Frequency advisory committees may employ other models such as Longley-Rice and TechNote 101. LMCC Guidelines for the Frequency Coordination and Certification of High Power Systems on UHF Offset Channels within the Industrial/Business Pool

DOCKSIDE/CARGO (Limitation # 60 frequencies)

LMCC will not oppose use of these frequencies for non-dockside applications on a secondary, low power basis if coordinated and location licenced. LMCC Comments in the matter of 1998 Biennial Regulatory Review, WT Docket No. 98-182, Para IIA

EXISTING SECONDARY LICENSEES

Under these LMCC recommendations, those entities licensed on a secondary basis on the 12.5 kHz offset frequencies would have several options: LMCC Plan, 6/4/97, Details @ 6

  • Locate on one of the designated coordinated low power channels on a co-primary shared basis with other co-channel low power users. (Some licensees would have to change frequency, others would not.) Those employing 12.5 kHz equipment would also be co-primary with respect to full power users on adjacent channels 12.5 kHz removed. Those continuing to use 25 kHz equipment would remain secondary with respect to full power users on adjacent channels 12.5 kHz removed.

  • Some low power licensees may also want to seek a protected service area (PSA) designation on one of the coordinated low power channels if/when the Commission provides that option. Given current channel usage, a PSA designation will not be possible for all existing licensees.

  • Locate on one of the itinerant low power channels on a co-primary shared basis with respect to other co-channel itinerant users. Neither PSA's nor protection from full power operations on adjacent channels 12.5 kHz removed would be an option as there is no coordination for itinerant channels.

  • Stay on currently licensed offset channel(s) on a secondary basis. Unless the current channel is one of the channels chosen for (1) or (2) above, the low power licensee choosing this option would risk increased interference from new full power users added to the channel.



LOW POWER COORDINATED

LMCC recommends 50 channel pairs in the 450-470 MHZ band (See Appendix A) be set aside for LOW POWER COORDINATED use, subject to the following conditions:

  • Site specific coordination required for both high and low power operations.

  • 12.5kHz bandwidth

  • Maximum power: 5 watts mobile/portable

  • 20 watts ERP base station

  • Maximum fixed antenna height of 23 M (75 feet) above ground.

  • 10 designated channel pairs for nationwide use

  • 40 remaining channel pairs for use within 80 km (50 miles) of the top 100 urban areas.

Outside of the 80 km radius, the 40 latter channel pairs may be assigned full power status subject to proposed coordination procedures using contour analysis. LMCC Plan, 6/4/97, Details @ 1

LOW POWER COORDINATED, NON-VOICE

LMCC recommends 10 channel pairs in the 450-470 MHZ band (see Appendix B) be set aside for LOW POWER COORDINATED, NON-VOICE use, subject to the following conditions:

  • Site specific coordination required for both high and low power operations.

  • 12.5 kHz bandwidth

  • Maximum power: 2 watts ERP

  • Maximum fixed antenna height of 7 M (20 feet) above ground

  • Voice operations permitted on a secondary, non-interference basis.

These channels are designated for remote control of medical devices, robotics, cranes, etc. LMCC Plan, 6/4/97, Details @ 2


LOW POWER ITINERANT NON-COORDINATED

LMCC recommends 25 channel pairs in the 450-470 band (See Appendix D) for low power, non-coordinated itinerant use nationwide.

  • Maximum power of 2 watts ERP

  • Maximum antenna height of 7 meters (20 feet) above ground for any fixed station.

  • Licensing is required but coordination is not.

New type acceptance grants for transmitters on these channels would specify that units must be capable of operation only on these 25 low power uncoordinated channels and on other UHF "dot/star" channels (464.5/469.5, 464.55/469.55, 467.85, 467.875, 467.9 and 467.925 MHZ already used for similar low power and/or itinerant operations. LMCC Plan, 6/4/97, Details @ 4


MOBILE-ONLY SYSTEMS

It's difficult to conduct a contour analysis for mobile-only systems. Certain frequency advisory committees may elect not to certify applications seeking high-power systems on offset channels. Regardless, six feet is to be used as the designated antenna height for mobile-only systems.

In a related matter, a number of frequency advisory committees have received and are processing applications for private carrier (MO6) systems. As a matter of prudent spectrum management, the LMCC Refarming Initiatives Task Force recommends that applications for low-power MO6 systems be assigned only on those offset channels that have been included within the 25 channel uncoordinated pool, as designated by the LMCC in its Low Power Pool proposal that was submitted to the Commission. Applicants for high-power MO6 systems may be directed to other channels. Further, the Task Force recommends against the coordination of wide-area, i.e., statewide, etc., MO6 systems, as such certifications are not deemed prudent spectrum management. LMCC Guidelines for the Frequency Coordination and Certification of High Power Systems on UHF Offset Channels within the Industrial/Business Pool


NON-COORDINATED LOW POWER ITINERANT

LMCC recommends 25 channel pairs in the 450-470 band (See Appendix D) for low power, non-coordinated itinerant use nationwide.

  • Maximum power of 2 watts ERP

  • Maximum antenna height of 7 meters (20 feet) above ground for any fixed station.

  • Licensing is required but coordination is not.

New type acceptance grants for transmitters on these channels would specify that units must be capable of operation only on these 25 low power uncoordinated channels and on other UHF "dot/star" channels (464.5/469.5, 464.55/469.55, 467.85, 467.875, 467.9 and 467.925 MHZ already used for similar low power and/or itinerant operations. LMCC Plan, 6/4/97, Details @ 4


POWER LIMITS, CENTRAL STATION ALARM

LMCC recommends maintaining the 2 watt power limit on the five channel pairs (Appendix C) designated for central station alarm use. LMCC Plan, 6/4/97, Details @ 3


PROTECTION CRITERIA

A DHAAT calculation is to be determined for the proposed as well as for any licensed or pending co-channel and adjacent channel system(s) that are identified following the appropriate geographic search that may require a protection analysis.


1. CO-CHANNEL SYSTEMS

Incumbent systems are to be protected such that the 21 dBu F(50,10) interference contour of the proposed system does not overlap the 39 dBu F(50,50) service contour of any existing stations.


2. ADJACENT CHANNEL SYSTEMS

Existing adjacent channel operations are to be taken into consideration in a similar manner, and to allow for the difference between co-channel and adjacent channel use, a derating factor is to be employed utilizing one of the following two methods:

A. Incumbent systems are to be protected so that the 21 dBu F(50,10) interference contour of the proposed station does not overlap the 39 dBu F (50,50) service contour of the existing station(s); however a 19.5 dB derating is to be used when calculating the interference contour, or

B. Incumbent systems are to be protected so that the 40.5 dBu F(50,10) interference contour of the proposed station does not overlap the 39 dBu F(50,50) service contour of the existing station(s). This change in the interference contour takes into account the reduced area in which the proposed station could interfere, based upon its offset channel position. The 40.5 dBu contour is equivalent to the 19.5 derating , thus avoiding having to conduct an extra calculation.

LMCC Guidelines for the Frequency Coordination and Certification of High Power Systems on UHF Offset Channels within the Industrial/Business Pool


PUBLIC SAFETY POOL

LMCC (based on PSCC input) recommends 14 - 12.5 kHz channel pairs in the 450-470 MHZ band (See Appendix E) be set aside for low power coordinated use nationwide by Public Safety.

  • Maximum power of 5 watts ERP.

  • Maximum antenna height of 7 meters (20 feet) about ground for any fixed station.

  • Requires site and station class specific coordination and licensing.

LMCC further recommends that existing licensees on public safety low power secondary systems consider a transition to one of the designated low power channels as soon as possible because the remaining 12.5 (offset) channel pairs in the public safety pool are now available for licensing of full power stations. LMCC Plan, 6/4/97, Details @ II


SEARCH RADIUS

High Power, Offset Channel Query the database to a sufficiently large area to determine all potential co-channel and adjacent channel interference possibilities, typically 70-100 miles. Reduced search areas may be performed when a "high power" licensee is seeking a reduced power such as 5 - 10 watts. LMCC Guidelines for the Frequency Coordination and Certification of High Power Systems on UHF Offset Channels within the Industrial/Business Pool


SECONDARY LICENSEES, EXISTING

Under these LMCC recommendations, those entities licensed on a secondary basis on the 12.5 kHz offset frequencies would have several options: LMCC Plan, 6/4/97, Details @ 6

  • Locate on one of the designated coordinated low power channels on a co-primary shared basis with other co-channel low power users. (Some licensees would have to change frequency, others would not.) Those employing 12.5 kHz equipment would also be co-primary with respect to full power users on adjacent channels 12.5 kHz removed. Those continuing to use 25 kHz equipment would remain secondary with respect to full power users on adjacent channels 12.5 kHz removed.

  • Some low power licensees may also want to seek a protected service area (PSA) designation on one of the coordinated low power channels if/when the Commission provides that option. Given current channel usage, a PSA designation will not be possible for all existing licensees.

  • Locate on one of the itinerant low power channels on a co-primary shared basis with respect to other co-channel itinerant users. Neither PSA's nor protection from full power operations on adjacent channels 12.5 kHz removed would be an option as there is no coordination for itinerant channels.

  • Stay on currently licensed offset channel(s) on a secondary basis. Unless the current channel is one of the channels chosen for (1) or (2) above, the low power licensee choosing this option would risk increased interference from new full power users added to the channel.


STATION RECORDS

LMCC recommends that the Commission clarify Sections 90.439, 90.443 and 90.447 to specify that mobile transmitter measurements may be kept at: (1) the licensee's "home office", (2) the licensee's "local office" or (3) the licensee's radio maintenance provider. LMCC Comments in the matter of 1998 Biennial Regulatory Review, WT Docket No. 98-182, Para IIF

3. The sources of these proposals are listed in an appendix on the last page of this section.

************************************************************************************

APPENDIX A

Industrial/Business

50 Channel, Coordinated, Low Power Pool

451.1875 456.1875 452.1125 457.1125
451.2375 456.2375* 452.1375 457.1375
451.2875 456.2875 452.1625 457.1625
451.3125 456.3125 452.1875 457.1875
451.3375 456.3375* 452.2875 457.2875
451.3625 456.3625 452.3125 457.3125*
451.3875 456.3875 452.4125 457.4125*
451.4125 456.4125 452.4875 457.4875
451.4375 456.4375* 452.5125 457.5125*
451.4625 456.4625 452.5375 457.5375
451.4875 456.4875 452.6375 457.6375
451.5125 456.5125 452.6625 457.6625
451.5375 456.5375* 452.6875 457.6875
451.5625 456.5625 452.7125 457.7125
451.5875 456.5875 452.7625 457.7625*
451.6125 456.6125 452.7875 457.7875
451.6375 456.6375* 452.8125 457.8125
451.6625 456.6625 452.8375 452.8375
451.6875 456.6875 452.8625 457.8625*
451.7125 456.7125 452.8875 457.8875
451.7375 456.7375 452.9875 457.9875
451.7625 456.7625 462.1875 467.1875
452.0375 457.0375 462.4625 467.4625
452.0625 457.0625 462.4875 467.4875
452.0875 457.0875 462.5125 467.5125

* Indicates frequency pairs that are available nationwide.

In addition to the channels listed above, the same low power designations apply to the channels 6.25 kHz immediately above and below these channels.

********************************************************************************

APPENDIX B

Industrial/Business

10 Channel, Non-Voice, Coordinated Low Power Pool

462.2125 467.2125
462.2375 467.2375
462.2625 467.2625
462.2875 467.2875
462.3125 467.3125
462.3375 467.3375
462.3625 467.3625
462.3875 467.3875
462.4125 467.4125
462.4375 467.4375

In addition to the channels listed above, the same low power designations apply to the channels 6.25 kHz immediately above and below these channels.

********************************************************************************

APPENDIX C

Industrial/Business

5 Channel, Central Station Alarm, Low Power Pool

460.9125 465.9125
460.9375 465.9375
460.9625 465.9625
460.9875 465.9875
461.0125 465.0125

In addition to the channels listed above, the same low power designations apply to the channels 6.25 kHz immediately above and below these channels.

*******************************************************************************

APPENDIX D


Industrial/Business

25 Channel, Uncoordinated, Low Power Pool

461.0375 466.0375
461.0625 466.0625
461.0875 466.0875
461.1125 466.1125
461.1375 466.1375
461.1625 466.1625
461.1875 466.1875
461.2125 466.2125
461.2375 466.2375
461.2625 466.2625
461.2875 466.2875
461.3125 466.3125
461.3375 466.3375
461.3625 466.3625
462.7625 467.7625
462.7875 467.7875
462.8125 467.8125
462.8375 467.8375
462.8625 467.8625
462.8875 467.8875
462.9125 467.9125
464.4875 469.4875
464.5125 469.5125
464.5375 469.5375
464.5625 469.5625

In addition to the channels listed above, the same low power designations apply to the channels 6.25 kHz immediately above and below these channels.

********************************************************************************

APPENDIX E

Public Safety

14 Channel, Coordinated, Low Power Pool

453.0375 458.0375
453.0625 458.0625
453.0875 458.0875
453.1125 458.1125
453.1375 458.1375
453.8875 458.8875
453.9125 458.9125
453.9375 458.9375
453.9625 458.9625
453.9875 458.9875
460.4875 465.4875
460.5125 465.5125
460.5375 465.5375
460.5625 465.5625

In addition to the channels listed above, the same low power designations apply to the channels 6.25 kHz immediately above and below these channels.

********************************************************************************

SOURCE APPENDIX

The proposals contained in this section are from the following sources:

1.) LMCC COMMENTS IN THE MATTER OF 1998 BIENNIAL REGULATORY REVIEW, WT DOCKET NO. 98-182

2.) LMCC PLAN, 6/4/97

3.) LMCC GUIDELINES FOR THE FREQUENCY COORDINATION AND CERTIFICATION OF HIGH POWER SYSTEMS ON UHF OFFSET CHANNELS WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL/BUSINESS POOL